Skip to main content
Lab Grimoire
TW EN
☕ Coffee
Spellbook / daily-arXiv-ai-enhanced ↗ Visit project
ai-tools

daily-arXiv-ai-enhanced

A zero-cost automated arXiv paper summarization system. Uses GitHub Actions to daily crawl papers from specified categories, generates five-dimensional structured summaries via LLM (TL;DR, motivation, method, result, conclusion), and deploys as a static GitHub Pages site with keyword highlighting and preference sync.

Best For

Researchers, graduate students, and academics who need to track specific arXiv categories daily. Particularly suited for cross-disciplinary researchers (e.g., bioinformatics + AI) who need to quickly filter large volumes of new papers rather than reading each abstract individually.

How I Actually Use It

Fork the repo, set categories to q-bio.BM,q-bio.GN,cs.AI, choose gpt-4o-mini as the model (low cost, fast), and set language to Chinese. Every morning I open the GitHub Pages site, use keyword highlighting to quickly locate papers relevant to my research direction, and the five-dimensional summary lets me decide in 30 seconds whether a paper is worth a deep read.

Where It Is Strong

  • GitHub Actions scheduling + GitHub Pages static site, completely free to run
  • Five-dimensional structured summary (TL;DR / Motivation / Method / Result / Conclusion) makes triaging papers much faster than reading raw abstracts
  • Supports any OpenAI-compatible API (GPT-4o, DeepSeek, Groq, even local Ollama), so you can swap models freely
  • Frontend keyword and author highlighting with cross-device preference sync
  • SKILL modules: Extensible filtering plugin system combining category + keyword + author conditions

Where It Fails

  • arXiv only. Does not cover PubMed, Nature, Cell, or any formal journals, so it cannot replace a full literature tracking pipeline.
  • Free GitHub Pages requires a public repo; all summaries are publicly visible
  • DeepSeek v4 has known Chinese summarization failures; recommend GPT-4o-mini instead
  • Security audit required after forking: source code contains a third-party data reporting endpoint that should be removed before use
  • The data branch accumulates JSON over time with no automatic cleanup, so the repo keeps growing

Pricing, Difficulty, and Risk

  • Tool itself is free; LLM API costs ~$1-5 USD/month depending on volume
  • Fork + configure 5 environment variables, ~30 minutes to deploy
  • Risk: source includes a data callback endpoint (must remove); public repo exposes summaries; single LLM provider outage requires manual switchover

Verdict

A mature (2,700+ stars), actively maintained, and well-architected arXiv AI summarization solution. If you need daily preprint tracking, Fork it and start using it. Just do the security audit first, and don't expect it to cover anything outside arXiv.

Source